It seems the plan is already decided to simply raise the dues.
Why is there no true engagement with TAC members? How can members trust that taxes won’t be raised again??One of the commenters (Mark C.) suggested.
To raise revenue, before racing all members, why not consider a second membership level with some perks? Example, provide special parking status and provide a special phone line for reservations. Limit it to 99 members reflecting the member nationalities Yen 2 million? Sign me up! Problem solved.
There are other ideas in our comment section. TAC is a fantastic gathering of very able people, it’s best to engage those who want to help or be involved in making true decisions.
If you’re a TAC member and have any other suggestions, please comment below. (Comment policy here)
Bryan, we’ve been here before right?
I felt the survey was unfair too.
I could not agree more, Randy. Real operational cost reductions, anyone? Why was that not an option? It would be nice to see the BOG sharpen their pencils and do some heavy lifting.
I get that it’s tough and unpleasant to reduce labor costs but that’s the challenge of leadership.
I was annoyed at that survey they sent out. They had three choices all to raise dues and you had to rank in order of preference. It just assumed you had a preference for raising dues