People Love The Tokyo American Club!

Great to see everyone coming to the website.  We’re looking for more constructive comments!

Yesterday we had 142 visitors visit www.abetteramericanclub.com.  Not the top day, but a good showing.

Please give ideas on

1) How to better govern the club and keep our board engaged with members requests

2) Have a meaningful committee system or maybe throw that out all together and do something new

3) Better service our membership

If you have a good idea, post it as a comment below here and we’ll make the comment into a post so others can see it.

We’re also working on adding some survey features to the website.  All the work being done by a number of your fellow members.  What’s the cost to the club?  NOTHING!

We are investing in having not only a great building, but a great club which isn’t the building, it’s the people!

President’s Insight: We’re having a garage sale!

Was anyone else amazed by Lance’s recent “President’s Insight”? At a time when there’s serious debate about the Club’s future – and when there’s an election around the corner – his “insight” was that we’re selling the curtains!

In our view, Lance should be pushing for change, encouraging debate and answering members’ questions … like how come it’s going to cost an additional 3% to pay by cash. Not acting as the messenger for any and all activities that can be painted as neutral.

By trivializing the communication channel with members and refusing to deal with the real issues (like 3%, Lance!), Lance does himself and the members a disservice and cedes effective leadership to management and staff.

How about some real insights?

An Inside Job? TAC Members Speak Out

Dear TAC Member,
There is a new movie called “Inside Job” that is a must see  It details the root causes of the global financial crisis; the heist by Wall Street with the compliance of government.
An analogy can be seen at TAC where over the past 25 years, members have seen a devaluation of their memberships as management and the BOG orchestrated a reversal of roles whereby members now serve the interests of management. This has resulted in the top 10 executive staff`s (staggering) average compensation p.a. at Y28 million ( $350 thousand) and the average full time staff salary over Y8 million ($100+thousand). Over staffing and not outsourcing have added to the debacle.
New TAC is the final countdown as to whether the greed, bad decisions, the  heisting (TAC-jack) will survive. A complacent/transient membership has provided the culture for these excesses. The enemy does lie within. It is an Inside Job. It is us.
TAC`s budget for 2011 shows little change in payroll — Y1.8 bn.($22+million) that is 77% of operating revenue ( industry norm between 40% to 50%). At TAC in 1983 it was 52%.
TAC`s F&B Cost of Goods (COGs) is budgeted at 27% next year, an unscrupulous mark-up of just under 4 times cost ( marketplace norm about 33% to 35%). TAC in 1983 was 41% a 2.5 times mark-up. And sales were higher in 1983 than the 2011 budget and with 2600 members versus a plan of 3600. 1983 per member sales Y488 thousand; 2011 plan about Y280,000, a 41% decline without adjusting for inflationary price increases. Over the past 15 years TAC has experienced plummeting F&B sales per member. Perhaps the COGs data tell why.
TAC is a simple business to run. A captive membership pays entrance fees and dues accounting for 60% of its revenue. In 1983 it was 45% when it delivered value to members. Entrance fees are not part of operating revenue and are meant to be reserved for renovation and rebuilding. In the past 25 years these amounted to over Y200 oku ($250 million) most of which went to payroll. Voila.
A recent announcement by TAC is to charge members a 3% service charge from January if they pay by cash or credit card. No charge for bank debit. TAC should have a credit card(s) rate of about 1% (maybe less) but has one of about 3% due to lack of common business sense. This is another shining example of how members are not getting value for their money by a management focused on its own perks to the detriment of  members who are its employers. Members should reject any service charge.
The Y11bn. ($130+ million) 4% interest loan is a dead weight around the neck of TAC. After paying the 25 year loan to term there is still a principal of almost Y9bn. (over $100 million) to pay. The 1% amortization makes it almost an interest only loan. Extremely imprudent and potentially fatal. Members should demand that all of the entrance fees be used to accelerate the principal repayment which would be 4% annual amortization, not the 1% planned. This would force payroll cuts and encourage outsourcing.
The “Inside Job” movie shows Wall Street hasn`t changed that much. What about TAC? Will the Inside Job, TAC-jack, muddle through and carry on regardless? Or will the invisable hand of the marketplace win in 2011 and render it the equivalent of the Tokyo Banana Republic Club? A hint — to date your BOG battling average is just about zero.
Members voted down the dues levy in June and are outraged by the executive salaries, F&B prices, and the enormous (coup de TAC) loan. In a show of defiance, your tax and spend BOG renewed the GMs contract in September and passed a 2011 budget with no significant cuts. The financial accounts show that the Club has negative equity. You should Vote against the 2011 Budget and the BOG that approved it. God save the member.
Signed: Greg Carley (TAC President 1994-1998) Geoffrey Walker, Paulo Maques

Following The Smoke- Whose Idea Was This?

We have had several highly charged Townhall Meetings as certain members of the board of governors tried to push through rate increases contrary to their original promises that, ‘you can have a new clubhouse, and rates will not change for existing members’.  The membership did not buy that, and many groups have arisen to find out what is going on.  Much has come to light.  Who made these promises and who is trying to break them?

Of course, you can blame things on the economy as well as the drop in membership.  But how could any restaurant or hotel think that they would do any business on the backside of Shinagawa station no matter how captive the audience?

What is going on in the background?  Who actually could have skin in the game, or at least pride on the line?You’ll have to decide what you think, but we’ve been following the smoke.  The three names on the presentation pushing to spend millions and build a new clubhouse are-

1) Mike Bumgardner
2) Tom Brown
3) Dan Thomas

If you were at the last Townhall meeting, you are probably connecting the dots about now.  If you missed it, you can read the notes from the meeting here, you will likely find some interesting connections.

Elections are right around the corner.

TAC Elections: US Citizens: Recommendations

It’s time to turn our attention to the US Citizen candidates … now comes the fun!

[Naturally, all the opinions expressed here are solely those of the authors and do not represent the views of TAC or (obviously) the candidates! There is no intent to offend.]

Here’s our quick take on people you should consider voting for:

Nominee:Greg LyonsBrian NelsonCharles Rees
Recommendation

Yeah, baby!

Yeah, baby!

Yeah, baby!

Principal says …Works hard in class, and contributes well to extra-curricular activities.Brian takes unconventional approaches, but gets above-average results.Charles is a quiet boy, with much to commend him.
Wagtail Comment:Greg has been impressive on the Finance Committee, and is a strong advocate of change. Seems to get the need for strategy as well. Not afraid to stand up to the bullies or the power structure.
That’s good enough for us! 
Brian was a member of TWG1 and TWG2, and is all about getting change at our Club. Knows what the issues are, and is a contributor rather than an observer. Brian follows through on commitments, and doesn’t play politics. Sounds like the ideal candidate!We’re told Charles has been a go-to person on the Finance Committee, and as a former controller he should know where the bodies are buried. A good thing, … maybe … we think … perhaps.
Charles: What do you think now that you’ve kicked the tyres?
td>
One-Liner:Power to the people!As Hawaiian as Barack Obama!Go for it Charles!

The TAC Voters’ Packets Have Arrived

The Voter packets have arrived from the Tokyo American Club.  You should have them in your mailbox when you get home this evening we hear.

Back at you shortly with our recommendations for who we think would be the best board members.  There are some 3,000 members and there are nearly 100 of us going through this to get backgrounds on the candidates from former coworkers, suppliers, other board members, classmates, and all sorts of others.  We’re looking at the candidates who-

1) Are more keen to work in the interest of the club membership

2) Good communicators with transparency to the decision-making process

3) Have a good reputation in the community, business, and around the TAC.

Back at you shortly!

Thanks for your patience as MABT is a team of volunteers with a passion to build a better Tokyo American Club like you!

TAC Elections: Other Nationalities: Recommendation

Actually, Other Nationalities is a no-brainer. Feels like voting for the Queen. But in the interests of fairness and saran-esque transparency, here’s the dirt on Per. Bear with us as we figure out how to insert a poll in here to get feedback – in the meantime, hit us with your comments!

[Naturally, all the opinions expressed here are solely those of the authors and do not represent the views of TAC or (obviously) the candidates! There is no intent to offend.]

Nominee:Per Knudsen
Recommendation 

Principal says …Per tries hard in all subjects.
Wagtail Comment:Per has been working hard on TWG2. That means he supports all the recommendations, and is focused on bringing change to TAC. He deserves another term.

And there’s no other candidate!

One-Liner:Per’s no-nonsense approach is awesome when he channels his inner Viking!

TAC Elections: President: Recommendations

Here at MABT, we’ve been poring over the candidate data trying to figure who deserves your vote this time around. We’re still trying to figure out how to insert a poll in here to get your feedback – in the meantime, hit us with your comments!

We will be asking all candidates to respond to a survey on their views on the key issues. Stay tuned!

[Naturally, all the opinions expressed here are solely those of the authors and do not represent the views of TAC or (obviously) the candidates!.]

Here’s our quick take on El Presidente:

Nominee:Lance LeeRod Nussbaum
Recommendation

No way!

Yes way!

Principal says …Doesn’t play well with other boys.New to the school. Still making friends.
Wagtail Comment:Sorry, Lance, but you signed the new GM contract. That’s got people angry. And if you sup with The Devil, you have to accept that sometimes the chalice is poisoned.And that 3% charge on cash payments … Say goodnight, Dick!.The gossip says Rod is closely connected tied to the status quo. Even so, his policy statement hits the right buttons in terms of the key issues: strategy, governance, and transparency.Still, the proof will be in the pudding!
One-Liner:Problem with Lance is it’s always someone else’s fault.A vote for Rod at least gives the Club a chance.