TAC Elections: Break out the Moet!

What’s that faint popping sound we hear? Some say it’s the champagne corks going off … the rumor is that Dan Thomas has NOT been re-elected, and that there are “new faces” on the BoG. Well done, MABT-ers!

Unfortunately, if you’re a Facebook user you have probably already seen the premature announcement from one of the presidential candidates whose name is not Rod. Still, it could be worse … it could have been a tie!

Now is the time for all good people to come to the aid of the Party; so keep the pressure up to make sure the TWG2 and FinComm recommendations are turned into reality. Tally ho!

Election Results

Well, we hoped our suggestions helped you with the elections.  We will post the results here on the MABT site as soon as they are announced.

Coming soon..

President’s Insight: We’re having a garage sale!

Was anyone else amazed by Lance’s recent “President’s Insight”? At a time when there’s serious debate about the Club’s future – and when there’s an election around the corner – his “insight” was that we’re selling the curtains!

In our view, Lance should be pushing for change, encouraging debate and answering members’ questions … like how come it’s going to cost an additional 3% to pay by cash. Not acting as the messenger for any and all activities that can be painted as neutral.

By trivializing the communication channel with members and refusing to deal with the real issues (like 3%, Lance!), Lance does himself and the members a disservice and cedes effective leadership to management and staff.

How about some real insights?

An Inside Job? TAC Members Speak Out

Dear TAC Member,
There is a new movie called “Inside Job” that is a must see  It details the root causes of the global financial crisis; the heist by Wall Street with the compliance of government.
An analogy can be seen at TAC where over the past 25 years, members have seen a devaluation of their memberships as management and the BOG orchestrated a reversal of roles whereby members now serve the interests of management. This has resulted in the top 10 executive staff`s (staggering) average compensation p.a. at Y28 million ( $350 thousand) and the average full time staff salary over Y8 million ($100+thousand). Over staffing and not outsourcing have added to the debacle.
New TAC is the final countdown as to whether the greed, bad decisions, the  heisting (TAC-jack) will survive. A complacent/transient membership has provided the culture for these excesses. The enemy does lie within. It is an Inside Job. It is us.
TAC`s budget for 2011 shows little change in payroll — Y1.8 bn.($22+million) that is 77% of operating revenue ( industry norm between 40% to 50%). At TAC in 1983 it was 52%.
TAC`s F&B Cost of Goods (COGs) is budgeted at 27% next year, an unscrupulous mark-up of just under 4 times cost ( marketplace norm about 33% to 35%). TAC in 1983 was 41% a 2.5 times mark-up. And sales were higher in 1983 than the 2011 budget and with 2600 members versus a plan of 3600. 1983 per member sales Y488 thousand; 2011 plan about Y280,000, a 41% decline without adjusting for inflationary price increases. Over the past 15 years TAC has experienced plummeting F&B sales per member. Perhaps the COGs data tell why.
TAC is a simple business to run. A captive membership pays entrance fees and dues accounting for 60% of its revenue. In 1983 it was 45% when it delivered value to members. Entrance fees are not part of operating revenue and are meant to be reserved for renovation and rebuilding. In the past 25 years these amounted to over Y200 oku ($250 million) most of which went to payroll. Voila.
A recent announcement by TAC is to charge members a 3% service charge from January if they pay by cash or credit card. No charge for bank debit. TAC should have a credit card(s) rate of about 1% (maybe less) but has one of about 3% due to lack of common business sense. This is another shining example of how members are not getting value for their money by a management focused on its own perks to the detriment of  members who are its employers. Members should reject any service charge.
The Y11bn. ($130+ million) 4% interest loan is a dead weight around the neck of TAC. After paying the 25 year loan to term there is still a principal of almost Y9bn. (over $100 million) to pay. The 1% amortization makes it almost an interest only loan. Extremely imprudent and potentially fatal. Members should demand that all of the entrance fees be used to accelerate the principal repayment which would be 4% annual amortization, not the 1% planned. This would force payroll cuts and encourage outsourcing.
The “Inside Job” movie shows Wall Street hasn`t changed that much. What about TAC? Will the Inside Job, TAC-jack, muddle through and carry on regardless? Or will the invisable hand of the marketplace win in 2011 and render it the equivalent of the Tokyo Banana Republic Club? A hint — to date your BOG battling average is just about zero.
Members voted down the dues levy in June and are outraged by the executive salaries, F&B prices, and the enormous (coup de TAC) loan. In a show of defiance, your tax and spend BOG renewed the GMs contract in September and passed a 2011 budget with no significant cuts. The financial accounts show that the Club has negative equity. You should Vote against the 2011 Budget and the BOG that approved it. God save the member.
Signed: Greg Carley (TAC President 1994-1998) Geoffrey Walker, Paulo Maques

Following The Smoke- Whose Idea Was This?

We have had several highly charged Townhall Meetings as certain members of the board of governors tried to push through rate increases contrary to their original promises that, ‘you can have a new clubhouse, and rates will not change for existing members’.  The membership did not buy that, and many groups have arisen to find out what is going on.  Much has come to light.  Who made these promises and who is trying to break them?

Of course, you can blame things on the economy as well as the drop in membership.  But how could any restaurant or hotel think that they would do any business on the backside of Shinagawa station no matter how captive the audience?

What is going on in the background?  Who actually could have skin in the game, or at least pride on the line?You’ll have to decide what you think, but we’ve been following the smoke.  The three names on the presentation pushing to spend millions and build a new clubhouse are-

1) Mike Bumgardner
2) Tom Brown
3) Dan Thomas

If you were at the last Townhall meeting, you are probably connecting the dots about now.  If you missed it, you can read the notes from the meeting here, you will likely find some interesting connections.

Elections are right around the corner.

TAC Elections: US Citizens: Recommendations

It’s time to turn our attention to the US Citizen candidates … now comes the fun!

[Naturally, all the opinions expressed here are solely those of the authors and do not represent the views of TAC or (obviously) the candidates! There is no intent to offend.]

Here’s our quick take on people you should consider voting for:

Nominee:Greg LyonsBrian NelsonCharles Rees
Recommendation

Yeah, baby!

Yeah, baby!

Yeah, baby!

Principal says …Works hard in class, and contributes well to extra-curricular activities.Brian takes unconventional approaches, but gets above-average results.Charles is a quiet boy, with much to commend him.
Wagtail Comment:Greg has been impressive on the Finance Committee, and is a strong advocate of change. Seems to get the need for strategy as well. Not afraid to stand up to the bullies or the power structure.
That’s good enough for us! 
Brian was a member of TWG1 and TWG2, and is all about getting change at our Club. Knows what the issues are, and is a contributor rather than an observer. Brian follows through on commitments, and doesn’t play politics. Sounds like the ideal candidate!We’re told Charles has been a go-to person on the Finance Committee, and as a former controller he should know where the bodies are buried. A good thing, … maybe … we think … perhaps.
Charles: What do you think now that you’ve kicked the tyres?
td>
One-Liner:Power to the people!As Hawaiian as Barack Obama!Go for it Charles!

The TAC Voters’ Packets Have Arrived

The Voter packets have arrived from the Tokyo American Club.  You should have them in your mailbox when you get home this evening we hear.

Back at you shortly with our recommendations for who we think would be the best board members.  There are some 3,000 members and there are nearly 100 of us going through this to get backgrounds on the candidates from former coworkers, suppliers, other board members, classmates, and all sorts of others.  We’re looking at the candidates who-

1) Are more keen to work in the interest of the club membership

2) Good communicators with transparency to the decision-making process

3) Have a good reputation in the community, business, and around the TAC.

Back at you shortly!

Thanks for your patience as MABT is a team of volunteers with a passion to build a better Tokyo American Club like you!

TAC Elections: President: Recommendations

Here at MABT, we’ve been poring over the candidate data trying to figure who deserves your vote this time around. We’re still trying to figure out how to insert a poll in here to get your feedback – in the meantime, hit us with your comments!

We will be asking all candidates to respond to a survey on their views on the key issues. Stay tuned!

[Naturally, all the opinions expressed here are solely those of the authors and do not represent the views of TAC or (obviously) the candidates!.]

Here’s our quick take on El Presidente:

Nominee:Lance LeeRod Nussbaum
Recommendation

No way!

Yes way!

Principal says …Doesn’t play well with other boys.New to the school. Still making friends.
Wagtail Comment:Sorry, Lance, but you signed the new GM contract. That’s got people angry. And if you sup with The Devil, you have to accept that sometimes the chalice is poisoned.And that 3% charge on cash payments … Say goodnight, Dick!.The gossip says Rod is closely connected tied to the status quo. Even so, his policy statement hits the right buttons in terms of the key issues: strategy, governance, and transparency.Still, the proof will be in the pudding!
One-Liner:Problem with Lance is it’s always someone else’s fault.A vote for Rod at least gives the Club a chance.

Summary Of TAC Townhall Meeting 27 Oct 2010

As the management of the American Club has apparently managed the TAC to the brink of financial failure, a group of 4 TAC members teamed up with 4 TAC board of governors.  This group was named ‘The Working Group 2” or TWG2.

This TWG2 presented their recommendations for how to fix the problems of the TAC.  They were very candid about what needed to be done.  Following their presentation, when asked if they “were confident that their recommended changes would be implemented?”.   the group unanimously responded “No”.  They responded on how getting information was slow and painful at TAC.

It was apparent to all present that there was a split between TWG2’s recommendations and some members on the board.  Although the positions of all the BoG (board of governors) was unclear, one board member made clear that he was against their recommendations in several instances.  In one case, he responded that the loan could not be renegotiated.  When asked by another member, he revealed that he was the one who negotiated the loan at 4 plus % interest for the club but did not clarify why he was unwilling to renegotiate and his position varied from that of the 4 TWG2 members.

The overall conclusion was that the problem of the club is not just an inept general manager playing the committee and board system, but also some individuals on the board of governors.  There are definitely some good people there, but there are also some people that need to move on.

A recommendation was made, and accepted by the President, to have a further meeting for the Board of Governor candidates to debate or state their positions as being for change or of the group that would continue the status quo and continue to block change and not make the changes necessary.

An American Chamber of Commerce (ACCJ) board member asked the General Manager if he paid for the development of yet another new TAC site that was described earlier in the meeting.  With a bit of stumbling around saying something about a ‘backend’ the GM confirmed that he did use budget to develop a new website.  The member went on to explain that the TAC must shift their thinking.  “The paradigm must change” he stated.  He illustrated his points by explaining how at ACCJ he paid nothing for web development, the chamber magazine, the upkeep of the website or virtually anything else.  This comment was a brilliant illustration that TAC needs people with fresh minds.

Although we have not covered all the questions and comments of the membership in this summary,  the conclusion we made from all that we need to rid the club of blockers on the board of governors and elect people who are willing to implement the changes.  One BoG member (mentioned above) seemed to indict himself at the meeting as being against change later on multiple points.  Later arguing with the TWG2 members about providing information that the 4 clearly stated they had not received.  The positions of the other BOG members and BOG candidates for the upcoming election remains unclear at this point.

The great work of the 4 board of governors and the TWG2 made it known that their work must be implemented otherwise we will have to continue “these

If you have any comments or would like to add any further points, please feel free to do so in the comment section below.  We will edit this summary accordingly to incorporate your comments.

Stay tuned!

A Quick TAC Analysis on the Vote

There is an understandable urge to parse and analyze the vote results for deeper meaning. Both those who voted “No” and those who voted “Yes” may be inclined to search for verification of “their” position.
Looking at the bigger picture implications (rather than the micro-analysis of how which sub-group voted) we can say that – with a turnout of nearly a thousand votes – one thing above all is clear: we all want to see the right actions taken to ensure a successful future for our club.
A thousand votes is more than 3 times the average turnout for a board election. That sort of active participation is exactly what we need. Tell us your concerns and ideas of how to make a better club. Your opinion matters, your voice counts.

There is an understandable urge to parse and analyze the vote results for deeper meaning. Both those who voted “No” and those who voted “Yes” may be inclined to search for verification of “their” position.
Looking at the bigger picture implications (rather than the micro-analysis of how which sub-group voted) we can say that – with a turnout of nearly a thousand votes – one thing above all is clear: we all want to see the right actions taken to ensure a successful future for our club.
A thousand votes is more than 3 times the average turnout for a board election. That sort of active participation is exactly what we need. Tell us your concerns and ideas of how to make a better club. Your opinion matters, your voice counts.